« Newer Older »

The creator of this page is MILLE and not Sophie, so can certain users please stop making wrong accusations!

I just want to make things clear on here that my older sister used to have a Buzznet page on here about six months ago called Sophie California, which no longer exists, but is was me who first uploaded this page for my own views, photos and videos as well as her photos and videos and stuff sent to me by friends. We thought of having a shared page on here for a long time and enjoy the site, so whoever is going around saying that Sophie still does everything on this page is WRONG. Three of us contribute to this page and have the password and yes, we all comment now and then and don't intend to start any online drama, whatever happened in the past stays in the past and I've just been told to say "no more dumb grudges". I live with my fiance Jonathan in Bournemouth, Dorset in the UK and Sophie now lives back in Surrey near London and still travels around everywhere getting band photos, but now works for a photo agency in London and a popular festivals website and that is how she gets photo passes. Those of you who know her and her other websites will have seen all the sets of recent live photos on there and some of the same photos on here, but unfortunately not all of the professional photos can be uploaded on here because none of us have the time to do it all and certain photos are for specific sites and we have to stick to that rule. Please don't get Sophie's own sites confused with this one and think it's okay to use the photos on here and steal them, because it's the same rule as with everyone else's pictures! We're able to get professional photos from different music events, but like I've said before, I can't upload them all, only whatever I get sent that are not all used for the other websites, but she takes hundreds of pictures and I think they're still all good. I take some of the photos myself, but usually have to make do with the camera smuggling into the venues like most of us do, but I still upload anything anyway. Most of you who use this site are interested in bands then it makes sense to upload whatever we can on here for all of you to see! We're all into music, but like different bands and have different views on things. I do any of the stuff on animals and everything other than the music related items uploaded and I think that's obvious. I've come across lots of really cool people on here and I intend to meet lots more. What I still don't get is the "scene queen" thing and all these girls who takes loads of photos of themselves with their friends and nothing of any creativity or real interest to anyone else other than people they know. That's okay for Facebook because it's a personal networking site, but I just think that Buzznet is more for media, music and photos of musicians and celebrities.

Many people have asked what cameras we use to take the all the photos on here, so here's the info.

My cameras: Panasonic Lumix DMC-TM3 and Sony Cybershot

I've had the Panasonic for the last two years and because is has a 10x optical zoom, it makes it so much easier to get really good close-up shots of bands performing live and the it's not considered as a really big professional camera, so at concerts I've been to I have never had trouble with security wanting to confiscate it from me. It cost me £160 when I bought it and now it's around the same price.

The little Sony Cybershot is really good for general use and I used this to take the videos of our cats that are on here and other normal close-up photos.

Sophie's camera: Sony DSLR-A700 with 75-300mm lense

This is used for all the professional live concert photos. Apparently it costs about £1,000 new and the lense is separate and I don't know how much it cost, but I guess it was expensive like all camera equipment is!

That's all I have to say for now, darlings. Take care and have a great weekend!


Posted on 06/14/2008 11:01 AM Visits: 108
PanasonicYouth: 06/17/2008 2:22 PM
Really? Sophie uses this account?

Thanks for admitting it. Since she's banned, I'm going to have to permanently suspend this account until further notice. If you're facilitating a banned user and allowing her access and participation on Buzznet, you've risked your own account. Sorry!
pyro1000: 06/17/2008 2:33 PM
Really? Sophie uses this account?Thanks for admitting it. Since she's banned, I'm going to have to permanently suspend this account until further notice. If you're facilitating a banned user and allowing her access and participation on Buzznet, you've risked your own account. Sorry!
i'm guessing this is in the terms of agreement , but i dont think too many people know about it.
PanasonicYouth: 06/17/2008 3:05 PM
No..........if you're banned from Buzznet. You're banned. Meaning you're not welcome back. If someone lets you use their account, we have to ban it too.
Really? Sophie uses this account?

Thanks for admitting it. Since she's banned, I'm going to have to permanently suspend this account until further notice. If you're facilitating a banned user and allowing her access and participation on Buzznet, you've risked your own account. Sorry!
But my uncle's cousin's best friend's doctor's niece's lawyer's bookie sat next to Jared Leto at dinner a few years back. And HE says she's totally justified in this!
pyro1000: 06/17/2008 3:24 PM
No..........if you're banned from Buzznet. You're banned. Meaning you're not welcome back. If someone lets you use their account, we have to ban it too.

i see the method behind the maddness , i'm just saying that i don't think alot of people know that.
PanasonicYouth: 06/17/2008 3:29 PM
I know what you mean, but it's generally considered common sense that if you're banned...you're not welcome? I don't know. It seems pretty obvious to me.
I know what you mean, but it's generally considered common sense that if you're banned...you're not welcome? I don't know. It seems pretty obvious to me.
...well...remember who we're talking about here (I mean that in reference to SophMillrockfornia, not pyro).
pyro1000: 06/17/2008 3:35 PM
I know what you mean, but it's generally considered common sense that if you're banned...you're not welcome? I don't know. It seems pretty obvious to me.

oh no , you are right. it is obvious. but people dont seem to think that letting there friends that were banned from the site use there own account , defeats the purpose. which it does , but they obviously don't realise it.
ontheguestlist: 06/19/2008 4:51 PM
What does the journal say? SOPHIE IS NOT ON THIS ACCOUNT! Look, I have no idea who you are, but leave us alone! New Age Amazon person should be banned for false accusations, internet bullying and slander because I don't appreciate some girl I have never met writing nasty comments about members of my family and lies! I don't know what happened with you and Sophie, but it's never been any of my business at all and using her photos is of no business of yours and is not doin anyone any harm. If you dont like her pictures or my videos or journals, then don't come on here and write crap like this and sabotage a webpage that is totally legit and of no offense to anyone! This kind of behaviour is so immature and you have no right to say things that are not true. I uploaded some of her photos because they are of interest to fans of bands on here, so if you don;t like them then go away and write all your hate mail about someone else on another site, becausee we don't want it here!
ontheguestlist: 06/19/2008 4:55 PM
Another thing, banning somebody's sister and her boyfriend from a site is going too far. Can anyone see anything we've written that is bad? You don't even know me or my family or friends so reinstate our sign in please because we don't deserve to be treated in this way!
Behaviour like this will give the site a bad name.
ellienor: 06/19/2008 5:11 PM
I get it Millie. Its your site you just put up Sophies work as she can't exhibit it herself due to being banned. not very different to anyone else adding other peoples pictures. For example my page i've not taken any of the MCR pics but it doesn't mean my page belongs to the people that did take the pictures.
Lauren: 06/19/2008 5:32 PM
I agree with ellienor. This is going beyond means of fairness and featuring another person's photos has nothing to do with anyone else's business as it's not doing anybody harm. I can't see any links to Sophie Jane's websites anywhere on here, but I have seen some of these photos on her sites but even on her sites there are no references to Buzznet and FOE anywhere.
somebody else: 06/20/2008 4:00 AM
panasonic youth - users should not be banned just because they may/or may not be related to another user who was banned ages ago!
newageamazon - you don't even know any of these people so fuck off and mind your own business!
PanasonicYouth: 06/20/2008 10:32 AM
Ontheguestlist: Sophie was banned for a reason. Allowing her to post or giving her an outlet for her photos contradicts her being banned. We don't want her or her work on this site.

Ellienor, she admits that Sophie uses the account. Straight up, that's enough to get banned.

Lauren and somebody else: I know you're Sophie. Stop it.
paxgitmo: 06/20/2008 10:36 AM
SockPuppet Orgy all up in heah.

Just sneaking in to say you missed a great possible page title - "I'm With teh Banned".
Total: 18 1 2
Add a Comment
Name Email

 
Sign Up or Sign In to have your picture next to your comment.
ARCHIVE
Ville Valo
Ville Valo
Ville Valo in action onstage at Rock Im Park
MY FRIENDS


Rockshots' Journal Widgets:
RSS | ATOM | JavaScript
Buzz Feed